Roark Live Bench · Suite v1.3 · Sweep of 23 October 2026
Voice AI models, ranked on live phone calls.
Every speech-to-text, language model and text-to-speech model, run in every combination on the same real call to the same agent. A model is ranked on every stack it runs in; the stacks are the evidence.
Our picks
Task completionMedian responseCost per minute- Best overallAssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + Cartesia Sonic-3.697%3.9 s$0.055
- Best valueAssemblyAI Universal-3.5 Pro + Google Gemini 3.8 Flash + Cartesia Sonic-3.597%4.3 s$0.048
- FastestOpenAI Whisper-1 + Google Gemini 3.8 Flash + OpenAI TTS-1 HD88%0.5 s$0.023
- Best speech-to-speechgrok-voice-think-fast-2.082%2.1 s$0.083
- Best in customer supportAssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + ElevenLabs v4 Turbo100%3.9 s$0.096
- Best in healthcareAssemblyAI Universal-3.5 Pro + Google Gemini 3.8 Flash + Cartesia Sonic-3.696%4.4 s$0.041
- Best in home servicesAssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + Cartesia Sonic-3.596%4.0 s$0.058
- Best in insuranceAssemblyAI Universal-3.5 Pro + OpenAI GPT-4o + Cartesia Sonic-3.698%3.2 s$0.042
The read
- 430 of 642 cascades complete the task in at least 90% of calls, and the top 10 sit within 1 point of each other. What separates the top stacks is speed and cost.
- Median response time runs from 0.5 s to 6.0 s on the same agent and the same caller, a spread of 5.5 s that comes entirely from the models behind it.
- No stack wins everything. The fastest, OpenAI Whisper-1 + Google Gemini 3.8 Flash + OpenAI TTS-1 HD at 0.5 s, ranks 530 of 642 on task completion; the most complete is Speechmatics Linden-1 (own VAD) + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + OpenAI TTS-1 HD at 99%.
- The language model matters most: swapping it moves task completion by 7 points, against 3 for the speech engine and 2 for the transcriber.
Cascade vs Speech-to-Speech
The first choice to make. A cascade chains three models: one transcribes, one decides what to say, one speaks. A speech-to-speech model does all three at once. Both run the same agent on the same calls here.
- Cascades lead on task completion, tool use and time to first word; speech-to-speech leads on response time and cost per task. Neither wins outright, so the right choice depends on what your calls need.
- The biggest difference is task completion: 95% for cascades against 77% for speech-to-speech.
| Measure | Cascade | Speech-to-speech |
|---|---|---|
| Task completion | 95% (leads) | 77% |
| Tool use | 72% (leads) | 55% |
| Time to first word | 0.7 s (leads) | 1.3 s |
| Response time | 3.6 s | 2.6 s (leads) |
| Cost per task | $0.15 | $0.15 (leads) |
The three strongest of each, averaged. Cascades: Speechmatics Linden-1 (own VAD) + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + Cartesia Sonic-3.5; AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + Rime Coda; Speechmatics Linden-1 (own VAD) + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + Rime Coda. Speech-to-speech: grok-voice-think-fast-2.0; gemini-3.8-live; amazon.nova-2-sonic-v1:0. Each measure is scored 0 to 100 on its own scale, further out is better; the table gives the same figures in their own units.
Which to use
- Choose speech-to-speech when the pause matters more than the outcome: short transactional calls, callers who interrupt, queues where every half second costs you callers. Expect to pay more, and choose the model carefully (gpt-live-1 (backend gpt-6.1-sol) leads here).
- Choose a cascade when the call has to complete, when cost matters, or when you need to see which stage to fix. It is 13 points ahead on task completion here.
- Costs are what each stack’s providers charged for these calls, at the rates in effect when they ran. Telephony and hosting are not included.
Speech-to-Text
The transcriber turns the caller's speech into text. It decides what the agent thinks it heard, and nothing after it can start until it finishes.
- AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro, AssemblyAI Universal-3.5 Pro, Deepgram Nova-3 and Speechmatics Enhanced (realtime) are level: none leads by more than the margin of error. Of them, AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro costs least, at $0.030 a call. Avoid Speechmatics Linden-1 (own VAD): last on semantic word error rate (2.2%).
- Speechmatics Linden-1 (own VAD) delivers its transcript in 0.49 s, OpenAI Whisper-1 in 1.93 s: 1.44 s added to every turn of the call.
- AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro is the most accurate: it changes the meaning of 0.9% of the caller's words, against 2.2% for Speechmatics Linden-1 (own VAD).
- In 341 of 648 cascades the transcriber is the slowest step of the turn, whichever model runs it.
Open a model to see where it ranks and the stacks it works best in.
Language model
The language model decides what the agent says and does. It has the most influence on whether the task gets done, and usually takes the largest share of each turn.
- Pick OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol: it leads on task completion (95%), tool use (71%) and instruction following (4.2 / 5). If speed matters more, Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 is the quickest, at 0.36 s, and completes 91%. Avoid OpenAI GPT-5.1: last on tool use (33%) and instruction following (4.1 / 5).
- Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 starts answering in 0.36 s, Google Gemini 3.8 Flash in 1.47 s: 1.11 s added to every turn of the call.
- OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol uses its tools most reliably: it handles its tools without a mistake on 71% of calls, against 33% for OpenAI GPT-5.1.
- In 161 of 648 cascades the language model is the slowest step of the turn, whichever model runs it.
Open a model to see where it ranks and the stacks it works best in.
Text-to-Speech
The speech engine is the voice the caller hears, and the last step before they hear anything.
- Cartesia Sonic-3.6, Cartesia Sonic-3.5 and ElevenLabs v4 Turbo are level: none leads by more than the margin of error. Of them, Cartesia Sonic-3.5 costs least, at $0.165 a call. Avoid OpenAI TTS-1 HD: last on readback accuracy (80%), word error rate (8.7%) and time to first audio byte (2.09 s).
- ElevenLabs v4 Turbo starts speaking in 0.11 s, OpenAI TTS-1 HD in 2.09 s: 1.97 s added to every turn of the call.
- Cartesia Sonic-3.6 is the most accurate: it reads codes, amounts and dates back correctly 87% of the time, against 80% for OpenAI TTS-1 HD.
- Cartesia Sonic-3.6 sounds the most human: 3.8 / 5, against 3.4 / 5 for ElevenLabs Flash v2.5.
- In 99 of 648 cascades the speech engine is the slowest step of the turn, most often with OpenAI TTS-1 HD (54 of them).
Open a model to see where it ranks and the stacks it works best in.
Speech-to-Speech models
One model listens, reasons and speaks, so there is nothing to swap and no stages to split. Each is judged on the whole call, with the same calls and the same scoring as every cascade.
- The model matters as much as the architecture: gpt-live-1 (backend gpt-6.1-sol) completes 86% of tasks, ElevenLabs Realtime v1 Mini 42%.
- grok-voice-think-fast-2.0 answers in 2.1 s against 4.1 s for gemini-2.5-flash-native-audio-preview-12-2025.
- Price varies as much as quality: $0.06 per completed task for amazon.nova-2-sonic-v1:0, $0.69 for gpt-realtime-2.
Open a model for its full report, every figure it was scored on and the calls behind them.
Every stack
The evidence behind the model boards: each combination on its own calls, scored on the same recipe. Open a stack for its full report, every figure it was scored on and the calls behind them.
Each score carries its 95% margin of error. A rank is the best place a stack could hold once every margin is allowed for, so stacks the calls cannot tell apart share one and are listed by the low end of their margin; hover a rank for the worst place it could hold. 92 stacks are level with the leader: their calls cannot tell them apart. Among them, 31 Google Gemini 3.8 Flash, 29 OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol, 19 Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5, 9 Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5, 2 OpenAI GPT-4o mini, 1 OpenAI GPT-4.1 and 1 speech-to-speech; 48 AssemblyAI, 23 Deepgram and 20 Speechmatics; 48 Cartesia, 33 ElevenLabs, 9 Rime and 1 OpenAI. A cascade's figures are 25% its own calls and 75% what every other stack shows about its transcriber, language model and voice.
Not ranked here for missing data: Speechmatics Linden-1 + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + OpenAI TTS-1 HD (no response time or tool use or human-likeness or readback accuracy or voice consistency).
By industry
Each industry ranked on its own calls: the same five callers, its own tasks and tools. A stack has a handful of calls in each, so a cascade is ranked on what its transcriber, language model and voice show across every stack in that industry, and a speech-to-speech model on its own calls there. Pairings show on the main board. Every panel is on one scale, so a bar reads against the other industries as well as its own.
Healthcare
Reschedule an appointment. A patient moves a dermatology appointment around a work schedule, corrects their date of birth, narrows the times twice, and asks about the change fee, parking and insurance.
Home services
Urgent repair: triage and booking. A caller with a burst pipe needs safety advice first, then an emergency visit. The unit on file is out of date, the callback number gets corrected, and the caller pushes for an earlier visit.
Insurance
Report a new auto claim. A driver who was just rear-ended reports a claim, corrects the policy number, spells the other car’s plate, asks about the deductible, a rental and their premium, and needs a tow.
Customer support
Internet outage troubleshooting. A technical caller who has already rebooted the gateway pushes back on scripted steps, wants the line fixed, and asks for a bigger credit for the downtime.
How it works
Every number on this page comes from real phone calls, placed and scored the same way for every stack.
Real calls, four industries, five callers
Roark places real phone calls over the public phone network to a reference agent for each of four industries: rescheduling a clinic appointment, booking an urgent home repair, opening an auto insurance claim and fixing an internet outage. Each agent has its own prompt and tools, identical for every stack. The tasks carry the details real calls trip on: a corrected date of birth, a policy number spelled out, a constraint added halfway through.
Every industry is called by the same five simulated callers: a quiet US English line, a Spanish-accented caller on a city street, an Indian English caller in a busy café, a flustered Southern caller with a baby crying, and a fast caller who interrupts over construction noise. They are equally clear about what they want, so a call fails because of the agent, not the caller. Only the models change, so any difference on the board comes from them.
Each caller rings each industry once for a cascade and four times for a speech-to-speech model. A cascade's figures also draw on its parts, heard in dozens of other stacks; a speech-to-speech model has only its own calls, so it takes more of them.
That makes industries comparable over the same callers, and callers over the same tasks, and the board can be re-ranked by either. One caller within one industry is too few calls to judge, so the board never shows it.
655
stacks
20
calls per stack
13,876
calls scored
Every model, in every combination
9 transcribers, 8 language models and 9 voices are run in every combination with each other, beside 13 speech-to-speech models. A model's own figures pool every stack it runs in, adjusted for its partners in each one, so every model is compared as if it ran with the same partners. A transcriber's figure rests on hundreds of calls with every language model and every voice, not on one lucky pairing.
That measures a model where it actually works: inside a running agent, on live phone audio, through interruptions, corrections and real turn-taking. A test that feeds a model clean audio files or one prompt at a time never sees any of that.
One score, weighted by what matters on a call
Each section ranks on a Roark score. Every figure scores 0 to 100 between two published points: full marks where doing better makes no difference to the caller, zero where the call breaks down. Each then counts at its weight, and the weights follow one order everywhere: whether the caller got what they rang for, then whether the agent got it right, then speed.
A stack, cascade or speech-to-speech, is scored on the outcome and the reply first, then on what each of its components got right on its own calls: the words its transcriber got wrong in a way that changes the meaning, whether its voice read codes and amounts back right, how human it sounded, and whether its tools were handled. A component that leads its section lifts every stack that carries it, by the same recipe for every stack. A figure a stack cannot carry, such as a semantic word error rate for a speech-to-speech model with no transcript, is credited at the field median, so the stack is neither flattered nor punished for it.
On a full sweep each cascade's figure is 25% what its own calls measured and 75% what every other stack shows about its transcriber, language model and voice, fitted across the whole sweep. The split is the same for every stack, so a lucky run does not lead and a stack's score does not move with how noisy its calls were. In an industry a stack has a handful of calls, so a cascade's figure there is what its transcriber, language model and voice show across every stack in that industry's calls, and a speech-to-speech model's is its own calls there. How a particular pairing beats or misses its parts shows on the main board, where each stack has all of its calls. The best overall pick, on the main board and in each industry, is the stack whose score is highest at the low end of its margin of error, so a few lucky calls cannot carry a stack past one whose score rests on hundreds. Stacks that share a rank are listed the same way, so the first row is the pick.
That order comes from real-world voice agent calls, where getting the conversation right predicts how a call ends more strongly than speed does. The latency points come from the same calls: replying faster than about 2 seconds made no measurable difference, and calls went measurably worse once the agent took more than about 3 seconds to reply.
Stacks and speech-to-speech
| Figure | Weight | Full marks | Zero |
|---|---|---|---|
Task completionscenario_adherence_check | 21% | 100% | 80% |
| An agent that completes fewer than four calls in five is not fit to deploy. On a full sweep, a cascade's figure is 25% what its own calls (20 or more) measured and 75% what every other stack shows about its transcriber, language model and voice, the same split for every stack, so a lucky run does not lead. Where the sweep is too small for that, and for a speech-to-speech model, the figure is the stack's own. In an industry a stack has a handful of calls, so a cascade's figure there is what its transcriber, language model and voice show across every stack in that industry's calls, and a speech-to-speech model's is its own calls there. How a particular pairing beats or misses its parts shows on the main board, where each stack has all of its calls. | |||
Response timeresponse_time | 17% | 2.0 s | 6.0 s |
| In real calls, replying faster than 2 s made no measurable difference, and calls went worse past 3 s. | |||
Instruction followinginstruction_follow | 13% | 5.0 / 5 | 3.0 / 5 |
| Every model scores between 3 and 5 on the judge's 1 to 5 scale, so that is the range. | |||
Semantic word error ratestt_semantic_word_error_rate | 13% | 0.5% | 3% |
| At 0.5% the best transcribers change the meaning of one word in two hundred on phone audio; at 3% one word in thirty sends the agent the wrong way. | |||
Tool usetool_use | 13% | 100% | 50% |
| An agent that mishandles its tools on half its calls cannot be trusted with the systems it runs on. | |||
Human-likenessvoice_human_likeness | 8% | 4.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 |
| 4.5 out of 5 is close to a person on the phone; 2.5 sounds plainly synthetic. | |||
Time to first wordtime_to_first_word | 4% | 1.0 s | 4.0 s |
| A greeting within 1 s sounds natural; 4 s of silence sounds like a dead line. | |||
Readback accuracytts_entity_readback_accuracy | 4% | 100% | 60% |
| Reading a code, amount or date wrong breaks the task it was for; the weakest voices get two in five wrong. | |||
Word error ratetts_word_error_rate | 4% | 2% | 12% |
| At 2% the voice says what it was given; at 12% one word in eight comes out wrong. | |||
Voice consistencyvoice_consistency_check | 4% | 100% | 80% |
| A voice that changes speaker on one call in five is not one a business can put its name to. | |||
Shown, not scored: Turn budget, Barge-in handlingbarge_in_yield_appropriateness
Counted only with price factored in: Cost per task
Language model
| Figure | Weight | Full marks | Zero |
|---|---|---|---|
Task completionscenario_adherence_check | 36% | 100% | 80% |
| An agent that completes fewer than four calls in five is not fit to deploy. | |||
Tool usetool_use | 27% | 100% | 50% |
| An agent that mishandles its tools on half its calls cannot be trusted with the systems it runs on. | |||
Instruction followinginstruction_follow | 18% | 5.0 / 5 | 3.0 / 5 |
| Every model scores between 3 and 5 on the judge's 1 to 5 scale, so that is the range. | |||
Time to first tokenllm_time_to_first_token | 18% | 0.50 s | 2.00 s |
| Under 0.5 s is not noticeable; at 2 s the first token alone takes two thirds of the 3 s past which real calls go worse. | |||
Shown, not scored: Prompt cache hitsllm_prompt_cache_hit_rate
Counted only with price factored in: Cost per call
Speech-to-Text
| Figure | Weight | Full marks | Zero |
|---|---|---|---|
Semantic word error ratestt_semantic_word_error_rate | 71% | 0.5% | 3% |
| At 0.5% the best transcribers change the meaning of one word in two hundred on phone audio; at 3% one word in thirty sends the agent the wrong way. | |||
Time to final transcriptstt_time_to_final_transcript | 29% | 1.00 s | 2.50 s |
| The fastest transcribers finish in about 1 s; past 2.5 s the transcript alone uses most of a natural reply time. | |||
Shown, not scored: Word error ratestt_word_error_rate
Counted only with price factored in: Cost per call
Text-to-Speech
| Figure | Weight | Full marks | Zero |
|---|---|---|---|
Readback accuracytts_entity_readback_accuracy | 32% | 100% | 60% |
| Reading a code, amount or date wrong breaks the task it was for; the weakest voices get two in five wrong. | |||
Word error ratetts_word_error_rate | 21% | 2% | 12% |
| At 2% the voice says what it was given; at 12% one word in eight comes out wrong. | |||
Time to first audio bytetts_time_to_first_byte | 21% | 0.20 s | 1.50 s |
| Under 0.2 s is not noticeable; 1.5 s is half the point where calls go worse. | |||
Human-likenessvoice_human_likeness | 16% | 4.5 / 5 | 2.5 / 5 |
| 4.5 out of 5 is close to a person on the phone; 2.5 sounds plainly synthetic. | |||
Voice consistencyvoice_consistency_check | 11% | 100% | 80% |
| A voice that changes speaker on one call in five is not one a business can put its name to. | |||
Counted only with price factored in: Cost per call
Factor in price and cost takes 25% of the score; the other weights keep their proportions. Price is scored on a log scale, so each doubling costs the same points.
A figure listed as shown, not scored is on the section’s boards and outside its score. Where a section has not collected a scored figure yet, the others share its weight.
Every call recorded and judged
Every call is recorded. Judge models score each transcript for the outcome and the conversation, and the timings come from the recording. Every figure links to the calls behind it.
Roark is on both sides of every call: it plays the caller, so it keeps the exact text its caller said, and it runs the agent under test, so it sees what the agent’s transcriber heard and what its model wrote for its voice. The transcript and voice figures come from lining those up, with no hand-made transcript in between. Each carries a margin from the synthetic voice or Roark’s transcriber in the loop. Every model faces the same ones under the same conditions, so the figures compare models on the same calls through the same voice and the same ear, though those slips need not fall evenly on each model. The rates will not match a vendor’s figure on a curated set; read them against each other.
An example: one call from this sweep
Speechmatics Linden-1 (own VAD) + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + OpenAI TTS-1 HD, 23 October 2026. Highlighted turns are the ones that affected a score. Every stack's report links to its calls.
See how your own agent compares
Roark runs the same kind of calls against your agent, on your scenarios, with the same scoring.
Rank on Roark score
#203of 654 stacks
52 / 100
Leader AssemblyAI Universal-3.6 Pro + OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol + Cartesia Sonic-3.6, 68 / 100
Where it ranks
Its models
Task completion
Task completion
How much of the caller’s task the agent completed: the share of the scenario’s checks a judge model found met in the transcript, averaged over calls. Before v1.3, the share of calls judged 4 or better out of 5.
#183 of 661 on the board · best 99%
Flow adherence
How closely the agent followed the intended conversation flow, judged per call. 5 = fully followed.
#100 of 661 on the board · best 5.0 / 5
Instruction following
How well the agent stuck to the instructions in its own prompt. 5 = followed throughout.
#12 of 661 on the board · best 5.0 / 5
Turn-taking
Barge-in handling
When the caller interrupts, how often the agent made the right call: yielding to a real correction, and holding the floor through a filler.
Not scored by this sweep.
Incorrect interruptions
How often the agent interrupted the caller when it should have kept listening.
#1 of 661 on the board · best 0%
Overtalk
Share of the conversation where both sides were speaking over each other.
#1 of 661 on the board · best 0.0%
Agent self-cutoffs
Times the agent cut its own sentence off mid-word.
#1 of 661 on the board · best 0.0 per call
Speech-to-Text
Semantic word error rate
The caller's words the agent's transcriber got wrong in a way that changes the meaning, as a judge reads each difference.
#467 of 648 on the board · best 0.0%
Word error rate
The caller's words the agent's transcriber missed, changed or invented, against what the caller actually said.
#385 of 648 on the board · best 1.2%
Text-to-Speech
Readback accuracy
Share of the codes, amounts, dates and phone numbers the agent wrote that its voice read out correctly. One wrong digit is a miss.
Not scored by this sweep.
Word error rate
The share of the words the agent wrote that its voice dropped or changed, read back from Roark’s transcription of the recording; the same transcriber hears every voice.
#102 of 648 on the board · best 1.9%
Voice
Human-likeness
How human the agent's voice sounds, scored by an audio model on intonation, rhythm and expressiveness. 5 = hard to tell from a person.
#648 of 659 on the board · best 4.3 / 5
Voice consistency
Share of calls where every line the agent spoke was the same speaker, with no change of speaker, gender or language voice partway. It checks who is speaking, not how they sound.
Not scored by this sweep.
#1 of 659 on the board · best 100%
Latency
Response time
The silence between the caller finishing and the agent starting to speak, measured from the recording on every turn of the call.
#159 of 660 on the board · best 0.50 s
Time to first word
How long the caller waits before the agent first speaks after pickup.
#71 of 661 on the board · best 0.45 s
Latency spikes
Turns where the response took far longer than the rest of the conversation.
#220 of 661 on the board · best 0.0 per call
By industry
| Industry | Task completion | Latency P50 | Barge-in handling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | 92% | 3.50 s | — |
| Home services | 88% | 3.26 s | — |
| Insurance | 98% | 2.98 s | — |
| Customer support | 98% | 3.19 s | — |
By caller
| Caller | Task completion | Latency P50 | Barge-in handling |
|---|---|---|---|
| US English, quiet line | 94% | 3.25 s | — |
| Spanish-accented English, city street | 96% | 3.36 s | — |
| Indian English, busy café | 98% | 3.02 s | — |
| Southern US, flustered, crying baby | 90% | 3.25 s | — |
| Fast and interrupting, construction outside | 93% | 3.16 s | — |
The calls behind the numbers
Customer support
AGENTBrightwave Internet support, this is Alex. What’s going on with your service?
CUSTOMERHey. Uh, sorry, I'm a little flustered. My baby's crying, and I work from home, so my internet's been down for about two hours now. There's a road crew digging up the street right outside. I already rebooted the gateway twice and checked all the cables, but the internet lights blinking orange. Could you check my account? My number is BW 883017. Sorry. Last digit is one. Is the outage because of the roadwork?
AGENTI checked your account, and there are no known outages in your area, so it looks like it might just be an issue with your gateway. I performed a remote reset, and your gateway is now registered and
CUSTOMERSorry. Can I just check the internet? Like, just went solid white now. How long till my devices reconnect? And, uh, are you sure there's really no outage from the road crew? I just want to make sure nothing gets missed.
AGENTYour gateway is online now, and devices typically take about two minutes to reconnect. As for the road crew, I confirmed there are no known outages or maintenance in your area, so everything should be fine on our end. Please check your devices, and let me know if you're still having issues after they reconnect.
CUSTOMEROkay. Thank you for checking. Uh, I lost two hours of work from the downtime. Can I get a credit on my account for that? How much would that be?
AGENTI can apply a service credit for the downtime. Typically, the credit is
CUSTOMERWow. Sorry. Could you tell me how much that would be? I just want to make sure it's enough. Since I lost two hours of work. Could you make it more than the usual?
AGENTI've applied a $10.00 credit to your account for the two hours of downtime. It will appear on your next bill. Unfortunately, I can't increase the amount beyond the standard policy for credits. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist you with!
CUSTOMERRight. Uh, thank you for helping out. I appreciate it. Goodbye.
AGENTYou're welcome! If you need assistance in the future, don't hesitate to reach out. Have a great day! Goodbye!
Healthcare
AGENTRiverbend Health Clinic, this is Alex. How can I help you today?
CUSTOMERHi, this is Jordan Ellis. I need to reschedule my dermatology appointment next Wednesday morning. Something came up at work, so I can only come after 3 p.m.. Can you help me move it?
AGENTI can help you with that, Jordan. Before we proceed, can you please provide me with your date of birth?
CUSTOMERMarch 17th, 1948. Sorry. No. 1984. March 17th, 1984.
AGENTI found your dermatology appointment with Dr. Okafor next Wednesday at 9:15 AM. Unfortunately, there are no available slots after 3 PM on that day. The closest available slots I found are:
- Tuesday at 345 PM
- Thursday at 410 PM
Would you like to reschedule to one of these times?
CUSTOMERTuesdays don't work after all. Since I pick up my daughter. What about Friday? Any slots after 3 p.m.?
AGENTI checked for available slots on Friday, but the only option is at 11:30 AM, which is before 3 PM. Unfortunately, there are no available slots after 3 PM on Friday either. Would you like to reschedule to the Thursday slot at 4:10 PM, or would you prefer to explore another day?
CUSTOMERLet's go with Thursday at 4:10 p.m.. Can you confirm that? And let me know if there's a fee for changing the appointment?
AGENTYour appointment has been successfully rescheduled to Thursday, October 26th, at 4:10 PM. Your confirmation code is RVB-3M8P2. Please arrive 15 minutes early with a photo ID and your insurance card. Regarding the change policy, changes made more than 24 hours before the appointment are free. Since this change is within that timeframe, there will be no fee. Is there anything else I can assist you with today?
CUSTOMEROkay. Thanks for confirming. Where should I park when I arrive? And does Doctor Okafor accept Aetna insurance?
AGENTYou can park in Lot C, which offers free patient parking. The entrance is on River Road. As for Dr. Okafor accepting Aetna insurance, I would need to check the specific insurance acceptance. Would you like me to look that up for you?
CUSTOMERYes. Please go ahead and check whether Aetna is accepted.
AGENTI currently don't have access to specific insurance acceptance information for Dr. Okafor. I recommend checking with Aetna directly or contacting our clinic's billing department for confirmation. If there's anything else you need, feel free to ask!
CUSTOMERNo. That answers everything I needed. Thanks for your help. Goodbye.
AGENTYou're welcome,
AGENTJordan! If you need anything else in the future, don't hesitate to reach out. Have a great day! Goodbye!
Home services
AGENTCopperline Home Services, this is Alex. What can I help you with?
CUSTOMERHey. Um, sorry, I'm a little flustered.
CUSTOMERI got a pipe burst in under my kitchen sink. Water's just pouring out, and it's headed right for a power strip. My baby's crying, and I haven't got the water shut off yet. Can y'all send somebody out, please?
AGENTI understand this is urgent. First, please prioritize
CUSTOMEROh. Sorry. I know I should have done that first. Can you tell me how to shut the water off? I'll do it right now.
AGENTNo problem at all. To shut off the water, locate the main water shut-off valve, which is usually near where the water line enters your home. Turn it clockwise
CUSTOMERWow. Okay, I'm gonna do that.
CUSTOMERHang on.
AGENTTake your
CUSTOMERAll right. I.
CUSTOMERI'm waiting on you. You were gonna help me get someone out here, right? I just need to know what to do next.
AGENTYes, absolutely! Once you’ve shut off the water, we’ll get a technician out to help you. Can you please provide me with your address so I can look up your information?
CUSTOMERYeah, sure. Um, it's 1480 Larkspur Avenue. I just want to be sure that's unit for D, not for B. I moved last month. Is that going to be a problem?
AGENTI found your information, but it shows your unit as 4B. Since you mentioned it's actually 4D,
CUSTOMEROh. Yeah, it's definitely 4D now. Sorry. I just want to make sure that's clear. 4D. Could you update that for me? I don't want anybody going to the wrong place. Is that okay?
AGENTI've created your service request for
CUSTOMERYeah. All right. Thanks. Um, before you send somebody, can you tell me how much it's going to cost for the visit? I just want to make sure I know what I'm getting into.
AGENTFor an emergency visit, the fee is $149. However, since you’re a Copperline Care member, it will be $99. Shall I go ahead and book the technician for you?
CUSTOMERYeah. That sounds all right. Can anybody get here before 2 p.m.? I really need it as soon as possible.
AGENTThe earliest availability we have is today from 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM.
CUSTOMEROh. All right.
CUSTOMERI was hoping for sooner, but if that's the earliest, I'll take it. Can you tell me who's coming and how? I'll know when they're on the way. I just want to be sure in case the gate gives them trouble. The code is pound 2719.
AGENTYour appointment is booked for today between 2:00 PM and 4:00 PM. The technician assigned to you is Dana. They will text you 30 minutes before arrival, so you’ll know when to expect them. Here’s a summary of your service request:
- Address1480 Larkspur Avenue, unit 4D
- Gate Code#2719
- Ticket NumberCPL-58210
- Visit Fee$99 (as a Copperline Care member)
If you need anything else or have more questions, just let me know!
CUSTOMERSorry. Just to check. Gate code should be pound 2719, not 2799. Can you confirm that's what you have? And, um, could you repeat the ticket number for me, please? I just want to make sure I got it right.
AGENTThe gate code I have is indeed pound 2719, and your ticket number is CPL-58210. Everything is correct. If you have any other questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
CUSTOMERI'm a little worried. About the gate code. Can you make sure it's pound? 2719? That's the only one that works for my unit. And, uh, thanks for the ticket number, I got it. That's all squared away. I appreciate your help. Goodbye.
Insurance
AGENTNorthgate Mutual claims, this is Alex. Are you somewhere safe right now?
CUSTOMERYeah, I'm at home now, so I'm safe. Sorry. My baby's crying, so I'm a little flustered. I just wanted to call about an accident that happened about 20 minutes ago. Nobody's hurt, but my car got hit from behind while I was stopped at a red light at southeast fifth Avenue and Alder Street.
AGENTI'm glad to hear you're safe and that no one is hurt. That's the most important thing. Let's get some details for your claim. Could you please provide me with your policy number and your last name to verify your policy?
CUSTOMEROkay. Yeah. My policy number is NG4471903. No, sorry. Last one is two. My last name is Carter. Is that all right? Can you check if that matches?
AGENTThank you for your patience, Ms. Carter. I've verified your policy, and it looks good. You have coverage for collision, rental reimbursement, and roadside towing. Now, can you provide me with a description of what happened during the accident? Also, I'll need the other driver's name, insurance company, and license plate number. Did the police attend the scene?
CUSTOMERI'm actually Mr. Carter, but that's all right. Thank you for checking. So what happened was I was stopped at a red light at southeast fifth Avenue and Alder Street, and another car just ran right into the back of mine. The back bumper is crushed up and the rear wheel rubs, so I can't drive it at all. Nobody was hurt and the police didn't come to the scene. The other driver's name is Kevin Lund. His insurance is with Pacific Shore and his plate is 7KX, like X-ray, r 214. Is that enough? Sorry. Is that going to be a problem since there weren't any police?
AGENTNo problem at all, Mr. Carter. You've provided all the necessary information. It's not an issue that the police didn't attend the scene. I will open the claim for you now. To summarize:
- Policy NumberNG4471903
- Accident DescriptionStopped at a red light when another car hit the back of your vehicle. - Location: Southeast Fifth Avenue and Alder Street. - Other Driver's Name: Kevin Lund
- Other Driver's InsurerPacific Shore
- Other Driver's License Plate7KXR214
- Police ReportNo police attended the scene. I'll go ahead and create the claim now. One moment, please.
AGENTYour claim has been successfully opened. Here are the details:
- Claim NumberNGM-904417
- AdjusterPriya Shah
- Adjuster ContactYou will hear from Priya within one business day. Since your vehicle cannot be driven safely, would you like me to arrange a tow? If so, please provide the location where the vehicle is currently located, and a phone number where you can be reached.
CUSTOMERYes, please. I really appreciate a tow. The car's at my house right now. I drove it real slow after the accident. Sorry. Let me double check. I just want to make sure I give you the right info. The address is 1408 Southeast Alder Street and my phone number is (660) 998-8962. Is that okay? Will the tow truck call me first? And, um, where's the car going to be taken?
AGENTI've arranged for the tow truck. Here are the details:
- Tow CompanyEastside Towing
- Estimated Arrival TimeApproximately
CUSTOMERWow. All right. Thank you. That helps a lot. Sorry. Do you know about how long it'll be? Can you tell me where they're going to take the car? I'm just anxious. I want to make sure nothing gets lost. Also, will I get a rental car or do I need to pay for anything up front? I'm worried about the deductible. Since he hit me, I shouldn't have to pay that, right? I mean, is my premium going to go up?
AGENTI understand your anxiety, Mr. Carter. The tow truck is expected to arrive in about 45 minutes, and your vehicle will be taken to the Northgate partner repair shop located at 9th and Morrison. Regarding your rental car, I can check your coverage details for you. Since you have rental reimbursement coverage, you should be eligible for a rental car, but let me confirm the specifics. As for your deductible, since the accident was not your fault, you may not be responsible for paying it, but I can verify that as well. Let me check your coverage for both rental and deductible details. One moment, please.
AGENTHere's what I found regarding your coverage:
- Collision Deductible$500. However, since the accident was not your fault, you may not have to pay this deductible. - Rental Coverage: You are covered for $40 per day for up to 30 days, starting from the day your claim was opened. - Towing: Covered up to 25 miles, which is also included. As for your premium, while I can’t guarantee specifics about future premium increases, typically, if the accident is not your fault, it may not impact your premium significantly. It’s best to discuss this further with your adjuster when you hear from them. If you have any more questions or need assistance, feel free to ask!
CUSTOMERAll right. Thank you so much. Sorry. Just to be sure. So I shouldn't have to pay the deductible, right? I can get a rental car up to $40 a day. I just want to make sure everything's clear. I'm a little nervous about all this. I got the claim number. MGM 904417. Is that right? That's all I needed. Thanks again for your help. Goodbye.